IT Brief NZ - NZ lagging in security and privacy risk management

Warning: This story was published more than a year ago.
risk.jpg

NZ lagging in security and privacy risk management

Kiwi organisations are being unnecessarily exposed to financial, regulatory, brand and productivity impacts though poorer management of security and privacy risks, according to a new security report from PwC.

The Global State of Information Security Survey says while Kiwi organisations seem to be taking cyber security and privacy seriously, we're lagging our global counterparts in some key areas.

The survey shows the number of detected security incidents leapt 48% in the past year, resulting in a real financial cost increase too with total financial losses attributed to security compromises increasing 34% over 2013.

The number of detected incidents hit 42.8 million – the equivalent of 117,339 attacks per day – in 2013. Detected security incidents have increased 66% year-over-year since 2009, the survey data shows.

Globally, big losses have been more common this year as organisations reporting financial hits in excess of US$20 million nearly doubled.

On the local front, 42% of New Zealand respondents have had employee records compromised – well above the global average of 29%.

Adrian van Hest, PwC partner and cyber practice leader, says New Zealand organisations were above average in developing a cyber security strategy, but were poorer at executing it, particularly the supporting elements such as standards, policies, classification of data and tools such as identity management, activity monitoring, risk management tools and encryption.

“So while senior executives in New Zealand organisations seem to be taking cyber security and privacy seriously by assigning ownership and responsibility for this within their organisations, we’re behind other countries in a number of key areas.

“For example, when it comes to privacy, we’re at odds with global practices such as requiring employees to complete training on privacy policy, formally acknowledging compliance and imposing disciplinary measures for violations.

“We’re also lagging behind in using big data analytics to measure the risk and impact related to information security,” van Hest says.

“These risks are exposing organisations to financial, regulatory, brand and productivity impacts and we’re encouraging them to address these.

“Cyber risks will never be completely eliminated, so organisations must understand that the perpetual and ever changing nature of threat, demands a fairly dynamic and proactive approach.”

Budget positivity

There was some good news when it came to security spend, however.

While globally, information security budgets have decreased 4% compared with 2013, with security spend as a percentage of IT budget stalled at 4% or less for the past five years, 6% to 7% of New Zealand organisations plan to spend more on their security budgets in the next 12 months.

“ Hopefully this means the increased level of activity in ownership of the issues and a strategic approach is now translating into investment and action,” van Hest says.

“Organisations will need to identify and invest in cyber security practices that are most relevant to today’s advanced attacks. It’s important that their processes are fully integrated for predictive, preventive, detective and incident-response capabilities to minimise the likelihood and impact of incidents.

Meanwhile, high profile attacks by nation-states, organised crime and competitors are among the least frequent incidents, yet the fastest-growing cyber threats. This year, respondents who reported a cyber-attack by nation-states increased 86 percent – and those incidents are also most likely under-reported. The survey also found a striking 64 percent increase in security incidents attributed to competitors, some of whom may be backed by nation-states.

Effective security awareness requires top-down commitment and communication, a tactic the survey finds is often lacking across organisations.

“It is vitally important for companies to focus on rapid detection of security intrusions and to have an effective, timely response.

“Given our interconnected business ecosystem, it is equally as important to establish policies and processes regarding third parties. Larger organisations need to be particularly wary as they’re more likely to be targets since they offer more valuable information and their size and complexity make attacks less likely to be detected,” van Hest says.

“Organisations must change from focusing on prevention and controls for security, to an information-centric and risk-based approach that uses controls to enable the business Information is a powerful business asset and the right approach to security and privacy will empower organisations to maximise its potential,” he concludes.

Interested in this topic?
We can put you in touch with an expert.

Follow Us

Featured

next-story-thumb Scroll down to read: