IT Brief New Zealand - Technology news for CIOs & IT decision-makers
Story image
Labour tables alternative patent clause
Wed, 12th Sep 2012
FYI, this story is more than a year old

Labour has moved to combat the government amended Patents Bill saying the current version would "effectively stifle New Zealand’s important software sector."

The Opposition Party says it has tabled an alternative amended clause, aimed at clarifying the intent of the legislation, which is to exclude software from being patentable.

“Craig Foss’ decision to amend the Bill – which originally proposed excluding computer software from being patentable, because like books, movies or music, it can be protected under copyright law – is badly worded and will provide a disincentive for innovation in the New Zealand software industry," says Clare Curran, Labour’s ICT spokesperson.

“It opens the door to the patenting of computer software and winds back a simple but vital change to our little known patent law.

"The Foss amendment makes the intent of the Bill ambiguous, will require the Courts to interpret the law’s meaning and will have a chilling effect on the software industry.

“Our clause, which is backed by the vast majority of New Zealand’s innovators, stipulates that a computer program ‘does not prevent an invention that makes use of an embedded computer program from being patentable’.

"It leaves the boundaries of embedded software to be determined by the Government on a case-by-case basis as appropriate.”

Labour says while their amendment would allow bigger companies such as Jade and Orion - New Zealand’s two largest software exporters - to excel, it would also encourage smaller companies to develop software to help build the sector.

“Labour will support the Patents Bill at the second reading, but if our amendment is not accepted we will vote against the Bill at the third reading," Curran says.

“New Zealand is becoming known as a place where software developers can develop their ideas without patent cases being brought against them as a defensive mechanism.

“We don’t need the Government doing anything that might jeopardise that."

What do you make of the current Patents Bill? Tell us your thoughts below.