itb-nz logo
Story image

MyRepublic in hot water over levy requirements

10 Jun 2019

The Commerce Commission has issued internet provider MyRepublic with a formal warning after it failed to meet its statutory obligations to provide the information needed by the Commission to allocate the Telecommunications Development Levy (TDL).

The $50m TDL is paid by larger telecommunications firms and is used by Government to pay for telecommunications infrastructure, including the relay service for the deaf and hearing-impaired, broadband for rural areas and improvements to 111 emergency calling services.

Under the Telecommunications Act, liable companies must provide the Commission with audited financial information that the Commission can use to apportion the levy.

Telecommunications Commissioner Stephen Gale said MyRepublic failed to provide accurate financial information, and an auditor’s report, within the statutory timeframe. The information it eventually provided did not meet the specified requirements.

“The efficiency and integrity of the TDL allocation depends on liable companies providing complete and accurate information to ensure the levy is split in the correct proportions. Where one company doesn’t meet its obligations, it can affect all the others that have,” Gale said.

As outlined in the warning letter, the Commission decided to issue a warning as MyRepublic has previously been compliant; it was liable for the TDL for the first time in 2017/18; its conduct was otherwise not serious; and the auditor assurance it provided in December 2018 was sufficient for the Commission to make the liability allocation determination in a way that did not impact other liable companies. The Commission will take this warning into account if MyRepublic engages in the same or similar conduct in the future.

Background:

The information disclosure requirements on companies liable to pay the TDL are set out in section 83 of the Telecommunications Act. Enforcement responses available to the Commission where a or company has failed, without reasonable excuse, to comply with section 83 are:

  • Issue a written warning.
  • Serve a civil infringement notice under section 156D incorporating a penalty of $2,000.
  • Apply to the High Court for an order requiring payment of a pecuniary penalty to the Crown. The High Court can impose a penalty of up to $300,000 for each breach.
Story image
Cognizant invests in IIoT with Bright Wolf acquisition
“Companies are increasingly embracing IIoT, and Bright Wolf’s team of senior IIoT architects have delivered the business value others have struggled to achieve. We look forward to this talented team joining Cognizant.”More
Story image
Analysts note SolarWinds’ share of IT ops management market
Ranked 1st by IDC for network management software market share – 2nd, 3rd and 4th by Gartner across ITOM performance analysis categories by revenue.More
Story image
How cloud telephony can add so much more to Microsoft Teams
Organisations that aim to set up cloud telephony functionality in Teams will need a helping hand, as the process can often be complex. More
Story image
Fusion5 expands professional services portfolio with acquisition of Mindfull
The deal, the terms of which were not disclosed, extends Fusion5’s portfolio of corporate performance management (CPM) solutions, as well as associated customers and resources.More
Story image
Aiven eyes Google Cloud Marketplace to further open source reach
Aiven operates managed open source database, cache, search, graphic solutions and events capabilities for customers worldwide.More
Story image
How 'data gravity' centres can spell trouble for enterprises
In the not-too-distant past, data was created in a much more centralised place, and users and systems had far less access to it. Now, with digital data from social, analytics, mobile, cloud, IoT and more being created with both simultaneity and omnipresence, so much information is being collected that it’s forming a ‘centre of gravity’.More