IT Brief New Zealand - Technology news for CIOs & IT decision-makers
Story image
The four business models for professional services firms and their benchmarks for success
Tue, 13th Feb 2024

Back in 2021, Harvard Business Review classified professional service firms (PSF) into four distinct business models, offering insights into the different strategies required to run a successful PSF in the modern world. It's a must-read article and as relevant today as it was back then.

In this article, we expand on their thinking and outline the benchmarks each business model should strive for as a measure of success. We hope this helps you discover what to track and what excellence looks like for your distinct professional services firm.

A practice can be highly profitable anywhere on the spectrum, provided it appropriately employs its profitability levers - Harvard Business Review.

1Commodity: efficient solutions for everyday challenges

Commodity practices offer clients structured, reliable, and budget-friendly solutions. 

They solve routine problems that require specialist knowledge, and since most of their projects are routine, they already know what they need to do and execute quickly. This allows them to reliably deliver and keep costs low for clients.

Real-life examples: Deloitte Business Process Solutions, Infosys, CapGemini, VRIZE.

Utilization: 80-95%
Your practice will want to be hyper-focused on efficiency if you're going to provide cost-effective solutions that still bring in healthy revenue. Due to this, your ideal utilization rate will be in the range of 80-95%.

Margin: <10%
While commodity practices generally operate on lower margins per project compared to the other business models in this list, it's still important for your practice to maintain a balance between competitiveness and profitability. Harvard Business Review states that for a commodity project, margins are often in single digits.

Leverage: High
Commodity practice leverage typically sits around 8:1 or higher (low experienced staff to experienced staff). Your practice will thrive when less experienced professionals handle the majority of routine tasks under the supervision of a smaller number of senior professionals spread across multiple projects.

Rate: Moderate - Low
Practices in this category often secure engagements by offering competitive rates. After doing some competitor research, you may find you're able to charge a lower rate for your services compared to other businesses. This advantage stems from the efficiency gained by concentrating on specific services, enabling your practice to deliver similar results at a lower cost.

2. Procedure: structured management of complexity
Procedure firms manage large, complex projects through a systematic approach. The problems they solve aren't typically new but instead are complicated as they require a lot of consideration and involve many moving parts.

Procedure firms are typically 'middle of the road' when it comes to success metrics. They offer a healthy amount of value with their ability to solve complex challenges but need competition.

Real-life examples: Accenture, Bain & Co, Vestas Wind Systems.

Utilization: 80-85%
This is a typical utilization rate for professionals who need to manage complex projects while maintaining optimal productivity.

Margin: 20-35%
Procedure firms typically operate with margins in the range of 20% to 35%. This range reflects the value added while still keeping rates competitive. Competition is still required for procedure firms as there are often many consultancies with similar skills.

Leverage: High - Moderate
Procedure firms should maintain a balanced leverage ratio of around 6:1 (low experienced staff to experienced staff). This ensures you'll deliver success to your clients by having senior professionals overseeing projects while less experienced professionals handle specific tasks, optimizing costs and securing a healthy margin on each project.

Rates: Moderate
Procedure firms typically charge moderate rates for their work. However, their rates can vary and are based on a combination of internal cost structures, market demand, and the unique value proposition offered by the firm.

3. Grey hair: wise counsel for ambiguous challenges
Grey hair practices provide seasoned experts for major, ill-defined issues where clients lack experience. The value of converting specific knowledge into applicable judgment is the driving force behind the success of grey-hair practices. 

With a long track record of delivering successful projects, their services are highly attractive to businesses with extra cash flow who want peace of mind.

Real-life examples: Boston Consulting Group, McKinsey & Company, Kearney, Oliver Wyman.

Utilization: 70-80% 
A target utilization rate of 70-80% is generally considered typical for a grey hair practice. This range ensures that senior consultants spend significant time on billable client projects, maximizing revenue and justifying the premium pricing for their specialized services.

Margin: 35-50%
It's typical for a grey hair practice margin to be within 35% to 50%. Being in a favorable position, they can charge higher rates due to their experience and track record, which clients value and are willing to pay more for.

Leverage: Low
In grey-haired practices, a leverage ratio of anywhere between 2:1 - 4:1 (low experienced staff to experienced staff) optimizes the deployment of senior consultants alongside those with less experience. This balance allows senior professionals to provide extensive experience to client projects with support where needed from other staff.

Rate: High
Grey hair practices set rates reflecting premium expertise. These rates are based on market research, the firm's unique value proposition, and the value of their experienced knowledge. Generally, their rates will be set higher to cover the costs of high-cost senior consultants and still make a healthy margin.

4. Rocket science: innovative solutions for modern challenges
Rocket science practices address unique problems with high stakes through rigorous analysis and state-of-the-art theory. Typically, they will be the only firm to deliver on certain projects, giving them the monopoly in their given speciality. These firms can be built up by professionals varying in experience, but what they have in common is that they are built up with innovators all hungry for success.

Success for rocket science practices is measured by high margins, a focus on innovation, and low leverage.

Real-life examples are Rocket Lab, Arup, and Palantir.

Utilization: 60-70%
Professionals in rocket science practices typically dedicate a significant amount of their time to intensive research, analysis, and innovative problem-solving. Due to this, their utilisation is typically the lowest of all business models, sitting anywhere from 60-70%.

Margin: 50%>
The margin in rocket science practices is consistently high, typically exceeding 50%. This is attributed to their specialized and high-value services, allowing them to command premium fees in the market. 

Leverage: Low
A ratio of 2:1 - 4:1 (low experienced staff to experienced staff) is typical of rocket science practises. Similar to grey hair practices, they operate with a low-leverage model, relying heavily on the expertise of senior professionals. This strategic approach significantly contributes to the delivery of services, resulting in a limited ratio of less experienced professionals within the firm.

Rate: High - Very High
Reflecting the unique and high-value nature of the services offered by rocket science practices, with typically no competition they have the freedom to charge high rates. This premium pricing is justified in the market, and clients are willing to pay high fees for their work.

Success looks different for every firm
The longevity of your professional services firm hinges on the measurement and adjustment of your 4 measures of success - utilization, margin, leverage, and rates.

The benchmarks for each business model in this article serve as guiding stars, offering a roadmap to success tailored to the unique challenges of different practices. From optimizing resource utilization to ensuring a healthy financial margin, balancing expertise through leverage, and setting rates that reflect your firm's value, we hope these benchmarks provide your firm with a framework for success.

If you're interested in learning more about optimizing your services business, be sure to check this out: